Intellectueel Eigendom en Privacy Erik Huizer

Intellectueel eigendom en privacy Eigendom van informatie Patenten Auteursrecht

Privacy Recht op Privacy : Van activiteiten Van informatie Controle over kwaliteit en gebruik van informatie over jou Privacy neemt af met de tijd Snowden

Mogelijke inbreuken op privacy Minder privacy voor beroemdheden Aftapmogelijkheden in telecomwet Slechte bescherming van je persoonlijke gegevens Surveillance camera’s Verzekerings en betalingsgegevens Registraties door overheden Camera telefoons Internetgebruikers Gegevens verzamelen en Combineren Facebook Google Identiteit stelen Reputatie management

Persoonregistraties WPR College bescherming persoonsgegevens http://www.cbpweb.nl/ Je mag een bestand aanleggen van op personen herleidbare gegevens mits: Reglement Registratie Inzicht verschaffen Geen religieuze, sexuele, raciale etc. gevoelige gegevens Uitzonderingen voor adresgegevens en medische dossiers

Wettelijk kader Europese richtlijnen Wet Persoons Registratie Maar ook: Wet op de telecommunicatie Anti-terrorisme wetgeving Patriot Act Wanneer van toepassing Nederlands/Europese organisatie Vestiging in NL die doet aan verwerking gegevens Niet: router Wel: Cookie

Internationaal Niet in alle landen en culturen dezelfde opvattingen over privacy In de USA worden bedrijven beter beschermd dan burgers En dat is slechter geworden met de invoering van de Patriot Act In Japan is er voor burgers geen recht op privacy Overheden zelf (secret services) malen niet om privacy

Wat kunnen we doen? Trapdoors in Encryptie algoritmen Hardware US/China ToR netwerk Open design/Open source Transparantie Zelf bouwen Markt dwingen Rol overheden?

How can we build an Internet That allows governments to track down Terrorist Criminals That protects the privacy Of other users That can be trusted That is resilient

Eigendom van informatie Bestaat dat wel? Hoe bescherm je dat? Wat is het voordeel? Wat zijn de nadelen?

Patenten Hardware Software USA vs Europa Is het al eerder vertoond? Open standaarden Open source

Open innovatie Crowd sourcing Traditionele bedrijven Gesloten en focus op IPR Versus een meer open ontwikkeling Google (Tegenhanger voor NSA trapdoors Open design open source)

Question In a world of co-creation and crowd-sourcing is societal innovation damaged by Intellectual Property or is it aided by Intellectual Property?

Copyright Geeft houder het recht bepaald gebruik te verbieden Gerelateerd: Naburige rechten Portret recht etc. Tweede openbaarmaking Etc. Stakeholders Artist/Performers Composers/Textwriters End-users Music-label/movie companies Distributors Rights organizations Retailers Governments Sport voorbeeld Voetbal over Internet

Where are we The current digital media and networking environment allows: Creation Distribution Re-purposing Sharing Personalising And more …… uses of content. e.g. 405 the movie

This gives us a chance to Do away with old restrictive (and often scheduled) distribution mechanisms Create a richer experience than just CD and DVD

But….. Difficult to devop the right business model copyrightholders will not share risks Many services have been challenged in court Google Video YouTube Mininova Pirate Bay Spotify

What was copyright for? To stimulate innovation and creativity To protect the efforts of artists and creators for them to exploit

How is it often used? to put the innovation and deployment risks with parties other than the copyright holders to protect commercial interest (rather than the creators interest) to limit the end-user’s rights by limiting access to content Lessig: The Mickey Mouse effect Scantier public domain

The e-book case Two main standards Amazon E-pub Several independent interfaces Kobo BeBook Sony Etc. Lock-in to bookseller sought Customers confused and resort to downloading

Who decides International problem Countries in Europe Not much room to decide anything Europe European commission USA Digital Millenium Copyright Act Music and Movie industry Very good lobby Anti Counterfeit Trade Agreement (ACTA) What exactly is decided there? Stop Online Piracy Act or SOPA DNS takedowns ISP as police Payment blocking

Japanse anti-piracy

The effect so far Lots of money spend on lawyers Filesharing development is stimulated Usage of MP3 and DivX Napster KaZaA/E-mule etc. Bittorrent Shinkuro ???? Spirit of the law is nowhere near to being achieved on the Internet And kids learn fast …… Trying to charge for embedding ……. Or introduce Spotify and the likes……..

AND Protected content effect: The people controlling the protection get to decide And not the law makers And not the users Even when copyright formally expires If Apple gets the biggest app store and Amazon the biggest content store? “Increasingly we are entering a world where you need a priori "permission" to do anything including accessing networks or sharing information and knowledge regardless of whether the underlying information is in the public domain or not.” … the Content Provider grants you a non-exclusive right to view, use, and display such Digital Content an unlimited number of times, solely on the Kindle or a Reading Application or as otherwise permitted as part of the Service, solely on the number of Kindles or Other Devices specified in the Kindle Store, and solely for your personal, non-commercial use. Digital Content is licensed, not sold, to you by the Content Provider. The “Industry needs to filter” effect Commercial companies are going to spy on me?

This can be changed The digital market will fully open: If the price is right It’s legitimate And convenient TNO/UvA study on economic benefits of downloading

Market influences Commercial Price Quality Presentation Accessibility Protecting (Water)Marking Enabling Law Enforcement (Awareness) Technology Policy

Nieuwe auteurswet Gebaseerd op DMCA Beschermt de bescherming van het auteursrecht Niet de wet, maar de techniek bepaalt wat we mogen Gevolgen: Eigen gebruik aan banden (rechten van burger worden teruggedrongen) Beperking wetenschappelijk onderzoek naar beveiliging Verdere beperking aanwas publiek domein

Copyright and Universities Goal is publishing But then you have to sign your rights away While the publisher earns money NWO requests copyright and open data Princeton has now stated that personnel and students can no longer publish if they have to sign their rights away Open peer reviewed publishing as an alternative? And what about the underlying data Should that be openly available too?

Naburige rechten/Portretrecht Auteursrecht en naburige rechten vormen voor niet ingewijden een onontwarbare kluwe Veel betrokken organisaties BUMA, STEMRA, SEKAM, CEDAR, etc. Lastig de juiste weg te vinden Veel onduidelijke (en onjuiste) verhalen over betrokken bedragen

Questions What should a new copyright act look like if we could start from scratch? Given the current copyright laws; how can we make sure that authors earn their dues with Internet distribution while at the same time allowing the users fair use?

The End