© Shopping 2020 TITLE Date Subtitle Logo Gastheer Logo Voorzitter.

Presentatie over: "© Shopping 2020 TITLE Date Subtitle Logo Gastheer Logo Voorzitter."— Transcript van de presentatie:

1 © Shopping 2020 TITLE Date Subtitle Logo Gastheer Logo Voorzitter

2 © Shopping 2020 1 Leden van de Expertgroep XXX

3 © Shopping 2020 2 Sadfasdf Asdfasdf Asdf asdfasdf

4 © Shopping 2020 3

5 4 Voorbeeld Staafgrafiek

6 © Shopping 2020 5 Voorbeeld Cirkel diagram

7 © Shopping 2020 HEX: #005F90 RGB: 0 95 144 HEX: #0088CD RGB: 0 136 205 HEX: #E6F3FA RGB: 230 243 250 HEX: #333333 RGB: 51 51 51 HEX: #CCCCCC RGB: 204 204 204

8 © Shopping 2020

9

10

11

12 11 Stroomdiagram Symbolen Zie tevens: http://www.tuxx.nl/stroomdiagram/symbolen/uitleg/ Proces of Activiteit Beslissing Document

13 © Shopping 2020 12 Voorbeeld Stroomdiagram Tip gebruik de standaard Powerpoint iconen Klant klikt op “transacties” in website Eerdere transacties Toon eerdere transacties Toon “geen transacties bekent” Nee Ja

14 © Shopping 2020 13 Shopping2020 Bag & Box

15 © Shopping 2020 14 Text Text 16 pt Text Drawing A 22A Standard shapes tool page Legend 1 Legend 2 Legend 3 Legend 4 New Quarter Half Three Full STICKER FTE CAGR 2009-10 Percent # 22 Title Unit of measure Numbering alphabetical Combined numbering  ←→↑↓↕↔ Solid Dashed Dotted # weeks 000 (2,25 pt line) (1,5 pt line) Text SOURCE: Source 1 Footnote ▪ Text “Text” – Author Text Drawing = + – × ÷ ± Text 14 13 12 11 10 16 15 9 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 A B C D E F G H I J Text ▪ Text Text 16 pt 16 Text 16 pt 16 Text

16 © Shopping 2020 15 Document quality checklist Is the document an appropriate length – not more than 20 pages for a typical 1-hour meeting? Did you circulate pre-reading to maximize time for discussion and put essential backup materials in an appendix? Does the document follow a logical structure with a single governing thought and 3 to 5 main supporting points, each backed up by analysis and argument? Have you included a clear, concise executive summary highlighting the main points and the decisions to be made? Are your exhibits legible – no smaller than 12 pt for discussion documents; 18 pt or larger for presentations? Does each exhibit have 1 main message, expressed in a crisp, compelling lead that is no more than 2 lines long, is written as a sentence, and uses a consistent and parallel syntax? Is the language clear, simple, and grammatically correct, with no jargon and no “consultant speak”? Have you checked the document carefully for typos? Is the math accurate, and are the footnotes and other page elements in the right places? Are there sources where needed?