Environmental data > education Prof.dr.ir. Taeke M. de Jong

1 Impacts of social developments Describe one of the A. Societal developments quantitatively and its possible impacts onA. Societal developments B. Resources B. Resources, C. Environmental pressure C. Environmental pressure, D. Environmental themes D. Environmental themes, E. Environmental quality E. Environmental quality, F1. Nature F1. Nature or F2. Public health F2. Public health. Name the radius of impact R={1,3,10,30 … m} and the term of impact T={1,10,100 or 1000 years}

2 Impacts of decrease of resources Describe one of the decreases of B. Resources quantitatively and its possible impact onB. Resources A. Societal developments A. Societal developments, C. Environmental pressure C. Environmental pressure, D. Environmental themes D. Environmental themes, E. Environmental quality E. Environmental quality, F1. Nature F1. Nature or F2. Public health F2. Public health. Name the radius of impact R={1,3,10,30 … m} and the term of impact T={1,10,100 or 1000 years}

3 Impacts of target groups Describe quantitatively an environmental impact of C2. Agriculture and horticulture C2. Agriculture and horticulture, C3. Industry, C4. Energy supply, C5. Traffic and transport, C6. Consumers, C7. Construction, C8. Actors in the water chain, C9. Waste disposal or C10. Trade, Services and Government (TSG)C3. Industry C4. Energy supply C5. Traffic and transport C6. Consumers C7. Construction C8. Actors in the water chain C9. Waste disposal C10. Trade, Services and Government (TSG) and its possible impact on Societal developments Societal developments, B. Resources, C. Environmental pressure, D. Environmental themes, E. Environmental quality, F1. Nature or F2. Public health.B. Resources C. Environmental pressureD. Environmental themes E. Environmental quality F1. Nature F2. Public health Name the radius of impact R={1,3,10,30 … m} and the term of impact T={1,10,100 or 1000 years}

4 Decrease of environmental impact Describe quantitatively a decrease of environmental impact of C2. Agriculture and horticulture C2. Agriculture and horticulture, C3. Industry, C4. Energy supply, C5. Traffic and transport, C6. Consumers, C7. Construction, C8. Actors in the water chain, C9. Waste disposal or C10. Trade, Services and Government (TSG)C3. Industry C4. Energy supply C5. Traffic and transport C6. Consumers C7. Construction C8. Actors in the water chain C9. Waste disposal C10. Trade, Services and Government (TSG) and its possible impact on Societal developments Societal developments, B. Resources, C. Environmental pressure, D. Environmental themes, E. Environmental quality, F1. Nature or F2. Public health.B. Resources C. Environmental pressureD. Environmental themes E. Environmental quality F1. Nature F2. Public health Name the radius of impact R={1,3,10,30 … m} and the term of impact T={1,10,100 or 1000 years}

World population

Agricultural surface

Per person

Yield per hectare

GLOBAL Ozone layer Climate change CONTINENTAL Cross-border air pollution Ozone on low level Acidification Winter smog Heavy metals FLUVIAL Rivers Regional waters Salt waters Water bottoms REGIONAL Accumulation Overfertilization Pesticides Heavy metals Removal Soil pollution Drying out LOCAL Noise nuisance Smell nuisance Air pollution in the city Interior environment Environmental problems

Possible futures

Causal and conditional thinking

Environmental data

Social developments A1. General developments A2. Agriculture and horticulture A3. Industry A4. Energy supply A5. Traffic and transport A6. Consumers A7. Construction A8. Actors in the water chain A9. Waste disposal facilities A10. Trade, services and government (TSG)

RUIMTE

Population and households Bevolking Huishoudens Eenpersoons huishoudens

Cattle

Ecological footprint

Claims

ECOLOGY

USE OF ENERGY

Photovoltaic

Energy: sun and use

Sun and resource

Final energy use

Reductions theoretical potential of wind

Comparison wind, sun en biomass

Alternatives

Sustainable

Wind, sun and heatpumps

Energy scenarios

ECONOMY Voertuigkm. Industrie BBP Part. bestedingen Afval Energie Bevolking Veestapel

CULTURE Criminaliteit Openbare orde Sociale zekerheid Economische groei Vrijheid meningsuiting Werkeloosheid Milieu

Finance

Resources B1. Energy carriers B2. Water B3. Space B4. Surface minerals B5. Timber B6. Fish B7. Ecological footprint

Environmental pressure C1. Total emissions and waste in the Netherlands C2. Agriculture and horticulture C3. Industry C4. Energy supply C5. Traffic and transport C6. Consumers C7. Construction C8. Actors in the water chain C9. Waste disposal C10. Trade, Services and Government (TSG)

Evironmental themes D1. Climate change - Enhanced greenhouse effect D2. Climate change - Depletion of the ozone layer D3. Acidification and transboundary air pollution D4. Eutrophication D5. Toxic and hazardous substances D6. Disposal D7. Desiccation

Theme-indicators

D1 Climate

Climate target groups and impacts

D2 Depletion of the ozone layer

Ozone layer target groups and impacts

D3 Acidification

Acidification target groups and impacts

D5. Toxic and hazardous substances

D5. Toxic and hazardous substances target groups and impacts

D7. Desiccation

D7. Desiccation target groups and impacts

Evironmental quality E1. Air quality E2. Surface water quality E3. Soil quality E4. Groundwater quality E5. The human living environment

Verstoring

Noise and risk targetgroups and impacts

Impacts F1. Nature F2. Impacts on public health

Biodiversity and health Biodiversiteit en gezondheid

Balance

Rareness and replacebility

National environmental policy DOELSTELLING: Het in stand houden van het draagvermogen van het milieu ten behoeve van een duurzame ontwikkeling. (Een ontwikkeling die voorziet in de behoefte van de huidige generatie zonder daarmee voor toekomstige generaties de mogelijkheden in gevaar te brengen om ook in hun behoefte te voorzien.)

Elaboration targets Mondiaal ContinentaalVoorwaarden FluviaalWaarden RegionaalDoelstellingen LocaalNormen

Impact-orientated policy Erfenissen uit het verleden Brongerichte maatregelen die niet op tijd komen Het voorbereid zijn op calamiteiten Het mogelijk tekortschieten van brongerichte maatregelen

Source-oriented policy emissiegericht volumegericht structureelintegraal ketenbeheer energie-extensivering kwaliteitsbevordering

Strategic agenda Reduceren onzekerheden Het maken van keuzen uit scenario’s Het formuleren van: thema’s signaleren en erkennen beleidsformulering oplossing beheer instrumenten samenwerking doelgroepen

Strategic agenda Thema’s klimaatverandering verzuring vermesting verspreiding verwijdering verstoring verdroging verspilling Instrumenten regelgeving aansprakelijkheid financiële regulering milieuzorg in bedrijven productnormering voorlichting technologie energiebesparing Samenwerking Internationaal Rijk Provincie Gemeente Doelgroepen Landbouw Verkeer envervoer Industrie en raff. Energie Bouw Consum. & detailhandel Milieubedrijven Research Onderwijs Maatsch. organisaties

Target groups Landbouw Industrie Raffinaderijen Energievoorziening Handel, diensten en Overheid Verkeer en vervoer Consumenten Afvalverwijderingsbedrijven Waterketen

Target group agriculture

Target group industry

Target group refinaries

Target group energy supply

Target group trade, services and administration

Target group traffic

Target group consumers

Target group disposal services

Waterproblems

Water chain

Target groups and actors

Environmental themes as agenda

Ehrlich en Speth D=BxWxM x1/2x2x5x1/20

Deminishing environmental loss

Increasing environmental profit

Propositions A.Er zijn geen andere ecologische problemen dan de aantasting van mondiale biodiversiteit of menselijke gezondheid. B.Uitputting van grondstoffen (waaronder fossiele brandstoffen) is geen ecologisch, maar een industriëel probleem. Wat uitgeput raakt is kwaliteit. C.Er is ook op de zeer lange termijn genoeg energie. D.Bouwen heeft ecologisch meer positieve dan negatieve effecten. E.De milieudruk per eenheid van welvaart moet tot 5% van het huidige niveau dalen. F.Er wordt in de bouw nooit meer dan 80% gehaald zolang de positieve effecten niet geoptimaliseerd worden. G.Eenzijdige nadruk op besparing blokkeert het ontwerpend denken over oplossingen.